The era of AI-powered political propaganda has arrived, and it’s reshaping how leaders communicate with unprecedented speed and sophistication. President Trump has emerged as perhaps the most prominent adopter of artificially generated imagery in political discourse, posting AI-created content at least 62 times on Truth Social since late 2022, according to a comprehensive analysis.
This isn’t merely about doctored photos or simple memes. Trump’s embrace of AI-generated content represents a fundamental shift in political communication—one that combines viral marketing tactics with cutting-edge technology to create compelling, often controversial messaging that dominates social media feeds and news cycles.
The implications extend far beyond politics. As AI content generation tools become more accessible and sophisticated, businesses, communications professionals, and marketing teams are grappling with similar opportunities and ethical challenges. Trump’s approach offers a revealing case study in how AI can amplify messaging, manipulate public perception, and blur the lines between entertainment and information.
Trump’s AI content falls into distinct categories, each serving different strategic purposes. He has deployed AI-generated attacks against political opponents at least 14 times, including images and videos targeting both Democratic leaders and Republican rivals. These aren’t subtle modifications—they often feature obvious digital manipulation designed to mock or diminish his targets.
Campaign-related AI content represents the largest category, with at least 19 AI-generated images or videos supporting his presidential bid. This included prescient content like an image of Elon Musk next to a D.O.G.E. (Department of Government Efficiency) logo, posted months before the cost-cutting initiative became official policy.
Policy-focused AI content appears less frequently but serves specific messaging goals. Trump has posted at least seven AI-generated pieces to illustrate policy positions, mock criticism, or celebrate administrative achievements. These range from depicting himself as a conductor after appointing himself head of the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts to showing himself atop a mountain beside the Canadian flag, reinforcing his suggestion that Canada should become America’s 51st state.
The most prolific category involves fantastical self-depictions—at least 21 AI-generated images or videos reimagining Trump in various heroic or elevated roles. These include receiving the Nobel Peace Prize, appearing as royalty, or being rendered as a fighter pilot in dramatic action sequences.
The tools powering this content have evolved rapidly from producing obviously fake images in 2022 to creating increasingly sophisticated renderings that can fool casual observers. Modern AI platforms like Grok (X’s AI assistant) and ChatGPT allow users to generate complex imagery simply by typing descriptive text prompts.
More advanced content requires combining multiple AI tools. For example, a video Trump shared featuring actor Robert De Niro involved replacing the actor’s lip movements with AI-rendered manipulations matched to an AI-generated voice soundalike—a technique known as deepfake technology.
AI detection tools, developed by organizations like The New York Times, help identify artificial content by analyzing pixel patterns, inconsistencies in lighting, and other technical markers. However, as generation tools improve, detection becomes increasingly challenging, creating an ongoing technological arms race.
The creation process itself is remarkably simple. Content creators can produce professional-looking political messaging in minutes rather than the hours or days required for traditional video production. This accessibility has democratized sophisticated propaganda techniques that were once available only to well-funded organizations.
The effectiveness of Trump’s AI strategy lies in its viral nature and emotional impact. “Trump is the most notable person sharing this content, but this is really becoming an international, new form of political messaging,” explains Henry Ajder, an expert on AI and founder of Latent Space Advisory, an AI-consulting firm. “It’s designed to go viral, it’s clearly fake, it’s got this absurdist kind of tone to it. But there’s often still some kind of messaging in there.”
This approach leverages a key insight about social media engagement: controversial content generates more shares than neutral information. “The more ridiculous the photo or video, the more likely it is to dominate our news feeds,” notes Adrian Shahbaz, vice president of research and analysis at Freedom House, a nonprofit focusing on democracy and liberty worldwide. “A controversial post gets shared by people who enjoyed it and people outraged by it. That’s twice the shares.”
The strategy proved particularly effective during contentious moments. After Trump’s first debate against Kamala Harris, when he promoted the debunked conspiracy theory about Haitian immigrants eating pets, he responded to criticism by posting AI images of himself embracing cats, ducks, and dogs. His supporters shared these images widely, transforming a potential liability into rallying content.
Trump’s use of AI content has grown more sophisticated and provocative since returning to office in January 2025. Recent examples include a video depicting Democratic House minority leader Hakeem Jeffries in stereotypical Mexican attire, and manipulated audio making it appear that Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer was disparaging his own party.
These more aggressive applications have drawn sharp criticism. Jeffries called one video racist during a televised statement, prompting Trump to post that interview edited with AI tools to include four AI versions of himself as mariachi band members.
Perhaps most controversially, Trump posted an AI-generated video in February depicting “Trump Gaza”—a futuristic version of the war-torn region rendered as a beachfront paradise with a gold statue of Trump at its center. Democratic lawmakers and Palestinian rights advocates condemned the video as insulting and disturbing, but the White House defended it, with a spokesperson calling Trump “a visionary.”
Some AI content has genuinely confused viewers about what’s real. After Trump posted a video including fictitious, AI-generated footage of former President Barack Obama being arrested, Truth Social users questioned its authenticity.
“Whoa…. Did this really happen?” wrote one user. “Is this real footage of Obama being arrested????” asked another.
This confusion extends beyond obvious political content. Trump posted and quickly deleted an AI-generated video about “medbeds”—fictional medical devices promoted in conspiracy theory circles as miracle cures. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt later said Trump “saw the video and posted it” but offered no further explanation, highlighting how even sophisticated political operations can struggle to verify AI-generated content.
Much of Trump’s AI content originates from external creators seeking his attention and amplification. The Dilley 3000 Meme Team, run by podcaster and former congressional candidate Brenden Dilley, has produced dozens of pro-Trump videos that the president has shared.
After the recent government funding fight, Trump posted a video from this group depicting himself and cabinet members in ominous cloaks reminiscent of the Grim Reaper. This symbiotic relationship between grassroots content creators and high-profile political figures represents a new model for political messaging—one that combines official communications with crowd-sourced propaganda.
“The truth no longer matters, all you have to do is go viral,” Dilley wrote on X during Trump’s re-election campaign, encapsulating the philosophy driving much AI-generated political content.
Trump’s approach offers important lessons for business leaders and communications professionals navigating the AI content landscape. The technology’s accessibility means that sophisticated visual messaging is no longer limited to organizations with substantial budgets or technical expertise.
However, the same tools that enable creative marketing campaigns also pose risks. Businesses must consider how AI-generated content might affect brand authenticity, customer trust, and regulatory compliance. The rapid evolution of both generation and detection technologies creates ongoing challenges for content verification and policy development.
The viral nature of AI content also demonstrates both its potential and its dangers. While businesses can leverage AI tools for engaging marketing campaigns, they must also prepare for scenarios where competitors or critics might use similar tools against them.
Perhaps most significantly, Trump’s widespread use of AI-generated content is normalizing these tools in mainstream political discourse. What began as obvious digital manipulation has evolved into increasingly sophisticated content that challenges viewers’ ability to distinguish reality from artifice.
This normalization has global implications. Politicians worldwide are adopting similar tactics, using AI to visualize policy outcomes, attack opponents, or present idealized versions of themselves and their programs. The technology offers new ways to bring partisan arguments to life, such as depicting overcrowded classrooms to support anti-immigration messages.
As AI-generated content becomes standard practice in political communication, businesses and organizations must adapt their own communication strategies while developing policies for identifying and responding to artificial content targeting their interests.
The White House has defended Trump’s approach as part of his successful social media strategy. “No leader has used social media to communicate directly with the American people more creatively and effectively than President Trump,” said Liz Huston, the White House’s assistant press secretary.
Whether this represents creative communication or dangerous propaganda may depend on one’s political perspective, but the impact on information landscapes and public discourse is undeniable. As AI tools continue advancing and spreading, Trump’s pioneering use of artificial content in political messaging offers both a preview of the future and a case study in the challenges ahead.