Klarna’s AI Customer Service Agents Signal Potential Disruption in Knowledge Work
OpenAI-powered agents handle two-thirds of customer chats, reducing costs and response times
Klarna recently revealed that during their first month of deployment, its AI-powered customer service agents, built using OpenAI’s technology, handled the equivalent workload of 700 full-time human agents. This accounted for two-thirds of all customer support chats. The AI agents resolved tasks in under 2 minutes, compared to the 11 minutes typically required by human agents, while achieving comparable customer satisfaction scores.
Our estimates suggest that Klarna’s 700 human agents handled 2.3 million conversations per month at a cost of $3.6 million, or $1.58 per conversation. In contrast, an OpenAI-powered agent addressing the same volume at 2 minutes per chat would cost no more than approximately $9,000 per month, or $0.004 per conversation, based on GPT-4’s current pricing. This switch from human to AI agents could potentially save Klarna nearly 100% in labor costs.
Although companies like Klarna will likely maintain human-in-the-loop systems to handle customer support cases that AI cannot resolve, the efficiency gains from AI are expected to significantly reduce the number of humans in customer support roles. Moreover, we anticipate that all language-centric knowledge work related to enterprise sales, technical support, and customer success will face substantial disruption.
Sebastian Siemiatkowski, co-founder and CEO of Klarna. “We are incredibly excited about this launch, but it also underscores the profound impact on society that AI will have. We want to reemphasize and encourage society and politicians to consider this carefully and believe a considerate, informed and steady stewardship will be critical to navigate through this transformation of our societies.
Recent Blog Posts
Six ideas from the Musk-Dwarkesh podcast I can’t stop thinking about
I spent three days with this podcast. Listened on a walk, in the car, at my desk with a notepad. Three hours is a lot to ask of anyone, especially when half of it is Musk riffing on turbine blade casting and lunar mass drivers. But there are five or six ideas buried in here that I keep turning over. The conversation features Dwarkesh Patel and Stripe co-founder John Collison pressing Musk on orbital data centers, humanoid robots, China, AI alignment, and DOGE. It came days after SpaceX and xAI officially merged, a $1.25 trillion combination that sounds insane until you hear...
Feb 8, 2026The machines bought Super Bowl airtime and we rank them
Twenty-three percent of Super Bowl LX commercials featured artificial intelligence. Fifteen spots out of sixty-six. By the end of the first quarter, fans on X were already exhausted. The crypto-bro era of 2022 has found its successor. This one has better PR. But unlike the parade of indistinguishable blockchain pitches from years past, the AI ads told us something. They revealed, in thirty-second bursts, which companies understand what they're building and which are still figuring out how to explain it to 120 million people eating guacamole. The results split cleanly. One company made art. One made a promise it probably can't...
Feb 3, 2026The Developer Productivity Paradox
Here's what nobody's telling you about AI coding assistants: they work. And that's exactly what should worry you. Two studies published this month punch a hole in the "AI makes developers 10x faster" story. The data pointssomewhere darker: AI coding tools deliver speed while eroding the skills developers need to use that speed well. The Numbers Don't Lie (But They Do Surprise) Anthropic ran a randomized controlled trial, published January 29, 2026. They put 52 professional developers througha new programming library. Half used AI assistants. Half coded by hand. The results weren't close. Developers using AI scored 17% lower on...